| 10.06.2008
Experience of patient trials and knowledge of
the biological compounds emerging from development were among the
factors that have won LCG Bioscience the new MHRA supplementary
accreditation for UK Phase 1 Units.
The need for specialist centres, such as LCG Bioscience, with the
necessary expertise and facilities to conduct complex studies was
highlighted in a report by the Expert Scientific Group (ESG) that
was set up to investigate the events surrounding the ill-fated
TGN-1412 study.
The new accreditation scheme came into operation in April 2008 and
provides formal guidance on the standards expected in a unit
conducting First In Human (FIH) Trials. The two tiers of assessment
are 'Standard' and 'Supplementary'. Standard accreditation indicates
that a company has been assessed as being competent to perform most
phase I clinical trials. Supplementary accreditation is reserved for
centres who can demonstrate experience and have robust systems in
place for the conduct of FIH trials involving drugs that would
require EAG (Expert Advisory Group) review.
Anthony Priestley, Medical Director at LCG Bioscience, a centre of
excellence for exploratory and early phase clinical development,
believes that the new Supplementary accreditation is an important
initiative by the MHRA:
"The UK has always been a preferred location for early phase
clinical trials. The scheme demonstrates the advanced state of
research governance in this country and provides reassurances to
study participants that their safety is paramount."
The Supplementary accreditation permits a centre to perform trials
with drugs that require a review of risk factors by EAG. The number of
drugs in development that meet this definition is increasing, and
there exists a clear need for specialist centres that have the
necessary expertise to conduct the studies. The UK's Accreditation
scheme has been introduced at an opportune moment, with the
pharmaceutical industry facing new challenges as a consequence of the
increasing complexity of the molecules now in development.
Whilst a demonstration of safety remains the foremost objective of the
first studies in man there is a need to prove as early as possible
that the drug is reaching its target and having the desired effect. |